<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple against podcasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/</link>
	<description>panayotis' notes about the web and everything else.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oneiros</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-19806</link>
		<dc:creator>Oneiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/#comment-19806</guid>
		<description>Well, hell, I guess next thing you know, the International Bonesetters' Association will be issuing cease and desists to podcasters, requesting removal of the term 'CAST'!
While trendsetting on design and UI issues, Apple is living in the Dark Ages, where consumer rights are concerned (they really &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; worse than Microsoft, on that front!), and has been making that mistake (ie. attacking IT prosumers and it's own customers), in one form or another, for years. I only hope they'll get their comeuppance one of these days, as Sony did with the DRM case, and this looks like the perfect opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hell, I guess next thing you know, the International Bonesetters&#8217; Association will be issuing cease and desists to podcasters, requesting removal of the term &#8216;CAST&#8217;!<br />
While trendsetting on design and UI issues, Apple is living in the Dark Ages, where consumer rights are concerned (they really <em>are</em> worse than Microsoft, on that front!), and has been making that mistake (ie. attacking IT prosumers and it&#8217;s own customers), in one form or another, for years. I only hope they&#8217;ll get their comeuppance one of these days, as Sony did with the DRM case, and this looks like the perfect opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-19804</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/#comment-19804</guid>
		<description>[...] Links </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panayotis</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-19798</link>
		<dc:creator>Panayotis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/#comment-19798</guid>
		<description>Daniel: "research"? No. Just some thoughts.
Regarding the iTS-podcast relation, you are kidding, right? Apple introduced podcast support in iTS and iTunes when podcasting was already a booming phenomenon. 

Most of the podcasts I listen to are not listed in iTS . Or maybe they are, but who cares? I subscribe to them directly, or using other "platforms" like &lt;a href="http://podshow.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;podshow.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: &#8220;research&#8221;? No. Just some thoughts.<br />
Regarding the iTS-podcast relation, you are kidding, right? Apple introduced podcast support in iTS and iTunes when podcasting was already a booming phenomenon. </p>
<p>Most of the podcasts I listen to are not listed in iTS . Or maybe they are, but who cares? I subscribe to them directly, or using other &#8220;platforms&#8221; like <a href="http://podshow.com/" rel="nofollow">podshow.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-19797</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/#comment-19797</guid>
		<description>It's sad.. Get yourself up to date or stop working on an advertising agency..

This so called research and it's conclusions are.. just funny.

NO Apple will not make their brand go boom and die, neither will the iPod suffer.

Since almost every podcast on the net goes through  iTS why do you think people will run for their lives just for Apple is taking control of the podcast trademark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad.. Get yourself up to date or stop working on an advertising agency..</p>
<p>This so called research and it&#8217;s conclusions are.. just funny.</p>
<p>NO Apple will not make their brand go boom and die, neither will the iPod suffer.</p>
<p>Since almost every podcast on the net goes through  iTS why do you think people will run for their lives just for Apple is taking control of the podcast trademark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bizwriter</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-19796</link>
		<dc:creator>bizwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vrypan.net/log/2006/09/26/apple-against-podcasters/#comment-19796</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. On the other hand, though, business realities (a.k.a. trademark protection) are not to be taken lightly. Reminds me &lt;a href="http://bizwriter.wordpress.com/2006/08/20/to-google-or-not-to-google-whats-in-a-name/" rel="nofollow"&gt;To google or not to google? What's in a name?"&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. On the other hand, though, business realities (a.k.a. trademark protection) are not to be taken lightly. Reminds me <a href="http://bizwriter.wordpress.com/2006/08/20/to-google-or-not-to-google-whats-in-a-name/" rel="nofollow">To google or not to google? What&#8217;s in a name?&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
