<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weird g-metrics findings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vrypan.net/log/2004/11/13/weird-g-metrics-findings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2004/11/13/weird-g-metrics-findings/</link>
	<description>panayotis' notes about the web and everything else.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iM</title>
		<link>http://vrypan.net/log/2004/11/13/weird-g-metrics-findings/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>iM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=49#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that the graphs reflect more the overall traffic that google receives?They are absolute numbers after all - I think they should normalise those numbers against their daily traffic and plot query percentages instead ("today 0.04% of the queries where about bunnies").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that the graphs reflect more the overall traffic that google receives?They are absolute numbers after all - I think they should normalise those numbers against their daily traffic and plot query percentages instead (&#8221;today 0.04% of the queries where about bunnies&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
